国产91视频久久,亚洲综合色图在线观看,五月天操逼网,日韩色色AV,青青在线A片,亚洲最大色在线观看,欧美熟妇丝袜诱惑,青青操逼视频,日韩无码操出水

 
Post My RFQ |
Home > GuideTrends  > Basic Chemicals  > Bromine Chemicals  > light-grade sodium carbonate

light-grade sodium carbonate

  • 1196CNY/TON Updated: 2026-05-29
  • Price change (DoD): 0
    Average price (3M):1211 CNY/TON
    Price Level(1Y):Low
    Follow Comparison
Prices

light-grade sodium carbonate Prices Trends in China

Select Spec:

light-grade sodium carbonate Prices sources

Reg Spec 2026/05/28 2026/05/29 2026/05/30 ChangeUnit Comparison
East China
  • Shandong Haihua 99.20% min;First-Class 1300 1225 - 0/0 CNY/TON
  • Shandong Haihua Food Grade, Content 99% 1100 - - 0/0 CNY/TON
  • Shandong Haihua 99.2% - 1380 - 0/0 CNY/TON
Domestic
  • China Salt Kunshan Appearance: Powder; Color: White; Packaging: 50 kg; Content: 99.2% 1520 1520 - 0/0 CNY/TON
  • Domestic 99.20% min;First-Class 1196 1196 - 0/0 CNY/TON

light-grade sodium carbonate Market Analysis

Light Soda Ash: Recent Commodity Market Intelligence, Analysis, and Forecast

I. Recent Market Intelligence
1. Price Trends
- On May 26, 2026, the Business Society’s benchmark price for light soda ash stood at RMB 1,196.00 per ton, representing a further narrowing of the negative day-on-day differential to -RMB 6.60 per ton compared with May 25, 2026.
- On May 6, 2026, the Business Society’s benchmark price was RMB 1,222.00 per ton—down from the level observed on May 25, 2026.
- On April 3, 2026, the Business Society’s benchmark price was RMB 1,212 per ton, up 0.33% from the beginning of April (April 1), yet the three-month average price stood at RMB 1,203 per ton—occupying the lower end of the past 12-month range.
- On May 27, 2025, the national market average price for light soda ash was RMB 1,386 per ton, down 0.57% from the prior trading day’s price of RMB 1,394 per ton, and down 1.56% from the beginning of May.

2. Regional Price Differentials
- As of April 7, 2026, the mainstream quotation range for light soda ash in the domestic market was RMB 1,120–1,560 per ton. Specifically: East China region: RMB 1,120–1,560 per ton; Central China region: RMB 1,100–1,200 per ton; North China region: RMB 1,200–1,270 per ton.
- On May 27, 2025, the North China region’s light soda ash price ranged between RMB 1,360–1,470 per ton, while the Northeast China region’s price ranged between RMB 1,390–1,570 per ton.

3. Enterprise Quotations
- On May 25, 2026: Shandong Haihua quoted RMB 1,300 per ton for its 99.20% min, premium-grade light soda ash; Henan Shunzhibang Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. quoted RMB 1,300 per ton for its food-grade (99% purity) light soda ash; Henan Baoxin Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. quoted RMB 1,100 per ton for its first-grade light soda ash (sourced from Henan Zhongtian and Hubei Shuanghuan).
- On May 26, 2026: Henan Kaijie Water Treatment Co., Ltd. quoted RMB 1,500 per ton for domestically produced light soda ash (specification: ≥98.8% min), delivery location: Zhengzhou City, Henan Province; Shandong Jinshengrun Chemical Co., Ltd. quoted RMB 1,300 per ton for domestically produced light soda ash (specification: ≥99.20% min, premium grade), delivery location: Jinan City, Shandong Province.

4. Supply-Demand Dynamics
- Supply Side:
- As of March 2026, China’s total soda ash production capacity exceeded 47.5 million tons annually, with daily output reaching 130,000 tons. Even considering monthly maintenance-related losses of 700,000 tons, the overall impact on supply remains limited. Producers have shifted from centralized annual maintenance to year-round distributed rotational maintenance. In March 2026, the maximum daily output reduction due to maintenance reached ~15,000 tons—only 11.5% of the national average daily output. As of April 2, 2026, enterprise inventories stood at 1.8861 million tons—up 21,300 tons from the previous trading day—and have remained above 1.4 million tons for 18 consecutive months, occupying the top 5% percentile (i.e., historically extreme high) of inventory levels.
- On May 27, 2025, as some enterprises resumed operations following maintenance, industry operating rates edged upward slightly, resulting in modest supply growth.
- Demand Side:
- Light soda ash demand in 2026 remains stable and moderately positive; however, downstream enterprises demonstrate low willingness to stockpile, leading to subdued market trading activity and increased procurement at lower prices. Heavy soda ash demand has declined, as daily melt capacity in flat glass and photovoltaic (PV) glass sectors contracts, weakening heavy soda ash demand fundamentals. This indirectly suppresses light soda ash pricing. Nevertheless, emerging sectors—including PV glass and lithium carbonate production—are driving an increase in demand for premium-grade light soda ash (purity ≥99.2%, Fe content ≤30 ppm), which now accounts for 48% of total light soda ash consumption. Yet this trend is insufficient to reverse the overall supply-demand imbalance in the near term.
- On May 27, 2025, terminal market transactions were limited; downstream buyers purchased strictly on a just-in-time basis. In certain regions, flat glass prices declined, further weakening support for soda ash.

II. Analysis and Assessment
1. Reasons for Weak Pricing
- Persistent oversupply pressure, coupled with historically elevated enterprise inventories, ensures abundant market availability—even scheduled maintenance exerts minimal constraint on supply.
- Demand-side weakness persists: downstream enterprises show low purchasing enthusiasm, new order inflows are sluggish, and buying behavior remains predominantly need-driven—resulting in subpar transaction volumes and a lack of upward price catalysts.

2. Causes of Regional Price Differentials
- Regional supply-demand imbalances vary. The North China region’s prices are approximately 5–10% higher than those in Central and East China—potentially attributable to relatively tighter local supply or higher logistics costs.

3. Causes of Enterprise Quotation Divergence
- Quotation disparities stem primarily from differences in product specifications, quality grades, and brand positioning. For example, Shandong Haihua’s premium-grade (99.2% purity) quote differs from food-grade (99% purity) quotes; higher quotations by certain domestic producers (e.g., Henan Sentie) may reflect specialized specifications or brand premiums.

III. Outlook and Forecast
1. Short Term (1–2 Months)
- Light soda ash prices are expected to remain in a narrow consolidation range, with limited volatility. On the supply side, concurrent plant maintenance and restarts will lead to a modest net supply increase. On the demand side, weak downstream demand and absence of strong catalysts will constrain price upside. However, close monitoring is warranted for shifts in enterprise operational status and changes in downstream restocking rhythms—if concentrated restocking emerges, it could introduce short-term timing-based price fluctuations.

2. Medium Term (3–6 Months)
- Should high-cost production capacity exit the market substantively (e.g., shutdowns of ammonia-soda process plants), and if export volumes rise (projected 2026 exports: 2.19–2.60 million tons), supply-demand tensions may ease marginally. Nevertheless, inventory drawdown will require time, and the price center of gravity is unlikely to shift significantly upward in this horizon.

3. Long Term (1+ Years)
- The share of natural-alkali-process production is projected to rise to 25%, accompanied by increasing industry concentration. Consequently, price volatility will likely moderate, with the long-term price center of gravity trending downward. The floor support level may gradually decline toward RMB 1,100 per ton—the approximate cost floor for natural-alkali-process producers.

More Related Products Prices

N,N-Dimethylformamide Potassium hydroxide powdered activated carbon Formic acid Propylene glycol Xylene ethyl acetate Sodium carbonate diethylene glycol Phenol Dichloromethane Glycerol tert-Butyl methyl ether Ethylene glycol Acetic acid cylindrical activated carbon styrene Isopropyl alcohol Epichlorohydrin Benzene

Guidechem assumes no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this site. The information contained in this site is provided on an “as is” basis with no guarantees of completeness, accuracy, usefulness, fitness for purpose or timeliness.

 
 
My Follow
Comparison
No Selected:0 indicators Follow Clear
Tip: Curve comparison supports up to 10 indicators, and the display order of indicators can be adjusted by dragging them,View Comparison
洛扎县| 广昌县| 丹江口市| 阜城县| 凉城县| 东丰县| 凌源市| 鸡东县| 正定县| 潞城市| 麻栗坡县| 长白| 绿春县| 黔江区| 遂平县| 洪泽县| 安国市| 广州市| 太仓市| 锦屏县| 沂水县| 通州区| 大足县| 开原市| 华坪县| 辽中县| 尼勒克县| 陆川县| 新昌县| 江川县| 龙岩市| 赫章县| 常山县| 合江县| 金华市| 班戈县| 德兴市| 渭南市| 乐亭县| 微山县| 临高县|