国产91视频久久,亚洲综合色图在线观看,五月天操逼网,日韩色色AV,青青在线A片,亚洲最大色在线观看,欧美熟妇丝袜诱惑,青青操逼视频,日韩无码操出水

 
Post My RFQ |
Home > GuideTrends  > Basic Chemicals  > Sodium sulfide

Sodium sulfide

  • 2641CNY/TON Updated: 2026-05-30
  • Price change (DoD): 0
    Average price (3M):2381 CNY/TON
    Price Level(1Y):High
    Follow Comparison
Products Suppliers Prices

Sodium sulfide Prices Trends in China

Select Spec:

Sodium sulfide Prices sources

Reg Spec 2026/05/28 2026/05/29 2026/05/30 ChangeUnit Comparison
East China
  • Fujian First-Class 2800 2800 - 0/0 CNY/TON
  • Shandong Industrial 60% red flakes 2600 2600 2600 0/0 CNY/TON
  • Shandong Industrial 60% yellow leaves 2650 2775 2900 250/0 CNY/TON
  • Shandong Badan 60% low-iron red flake - 2300 - 0/0 CNY/TON
  • Shandong Province First-Class Content99% - 2700 - 0/0 CNY/TON
Domestic
  • Domestic Industrial 60% yellow leaves 2641 2641 2641 0/0 CNY/TON

Sodium sulfide Market Analysis

Sodium Sulfide: Recent Commodity Market Intelligence Report

I. Price Trends
- Recent Price Volatility: According to Echemi (Business Community Network) data, sodium sulfide prices exhibited volatility in May 2026. The reference price on May 6 stood at RMB 2,622.50 per metric ton, unchanged from May 1; it declined to RMB 2,484.29 per metric ton on May 7—a decrease of 5.27%; and rebounded to RMB 2,627.14 per metric ton on May 22.
- Regional Price Disparities: Significant regional price differences exist across China. For example, on May 26, Shandong Hongyang Chemical Co., Ltd. quoted RMB 3,100 per metric ton (industrial-grade, 60% purity, yellow flakes, delivery in Shandong Province), whereas Guangzhou Tianyue Chemical Co., Ltd. quoted RMB 1,500 per metric ton (Shenhong brand, delivery in Guangdong Province) on the same day.
- Impact of Brand and Specification: Substantial price variation also occurs within the same region due to differing brands or specifications. For instance, Suzhou Senfeida Chemical Co., Ltd. quoted RMB 3,600 per metric ton (60% purity, delivery in Jiangsu Province) on May 26, while Liaocheng Jinxinda New Materials Co., Ltd. quoted only RMB 1,500 per metric ton (domestically produced, delivery in Shandong Province) on the same date.

II. Supply-Demand Dynamics
- Supply Side: China is the world’s largest producer of sodium sulfide, accounting for over 80% of global output. In recent years, tightening environmental regulations and enhanced occupational safety standards have led to the elimination of outdated production capacity, thereby increasing industry concentration. By 2026, a total of 1.45 million metric tons of obsolete capacity had been decommissioned, lifting the CR5 (combined market share of the top five enterprises) to 49%.
- Demand Side: Sodium sulfide is widely used in dyes, leather processing, non-ferrous metal smelting, textiles, papermaking, and other industries. China’s apparent consumption of sodium sulfide reached 606,800 metric tons in 2024, with downstream demand growth serving as the primary driver of market expansion. Rapid development of textile and leather industries in emerging markets—such as India and Southeast Asia—is further boosting demand for sodium sulfide.

III. Market Developments
- Regional Competition: Northwest China holds a high share of sodium sulfide capacity due to its low energy costs; however, under mounting environmental policy pressure, some producers are shifting toward high-purity liquid sodium sulfide or specialty-grade products. In contrast, eastern coastal regions face stringent environmental compliance requirements, prompting smaller- and medium-sized producers to exit manufacturing altogether—or pivot into trade and distribution hubs. Mid-region enterprises are mitigating cost disadvantages by deepening vertical integration—for example, establishing downstream dyeing auxiliaries production lines.
- Price Determinants: Multiple factors jointly influence sodium sulfide pricing, including raw material price fluctuations, environmental compliance costs, logistics expenses, and brand-related price premiums. For example, rail transport via dedicated freight lines dominates outbound shipments from the Northwest, with an average freight cost of approximately RMB 0.18 per ton-kilometer. Transporting product from the Northwest to downstream consumer hubs in East China incurs logistics costs of up to RMB 450 per metric ton; even after adding this freight charge, the delivered price remains roughly RMB 150 per metric ton lower than locally produced equivalents.

IV. Policy and Regulatory Environment
- Environmental Policies: Environmental emission standards have tightened by over 60%, and the nationwide carbon trading market now fully covers relevant sectors—imposing additional compliance costs of RMB 240–280 per metric ton on SMEs. Moreover, the EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) constitutes a de facto export barrier: carbon tariffs add approximately RMB 1,680 per metric ton to exports of high-carbon sodium sulfide products to the EU, accelerating structural shifts toward low-carbon, specialty-grade offerings.
- Occupational Safety Regulations: Upgraded occupational safety legislation has likewise increased compliance expenditures, further compressing profit margins.

Analysis and Outlook

I. Short-Term Price Trends
- Volatile Adjustment: Driven by supply-demand dynamics, regional competition, and regulatory impacts, sodium sulfide prices are likely to remain volatile in the near term. Low-cost supply from the Northwest may continue pressuring eastern markets, while rising environmental compliance costs could exacerbate price divergence across regions.
- Persistent Regional Disparities: Geographic price differentials are expected to persist: the Northwest may retain its relative pricing advantage owing to low energy costs, whereas eastern coastal regions—facing higher environmental compliance burdens—are likely to sustain elevated price levels.

II. Medium- to Long-Term Market Trends
- Capacity Optimization: As environmental policies tighten and safety regulations evolve, outdated capacity will continue exiting the market, further elevating industry concentration. The CR5 is projected to rise to over 85% within the next five years, leading toward an oligopolistic market structure.
- Demand Growth: Global manufacturing recovery and robust industrial expansion in emerging markets will sustain sodium sulfide demand growth. Under the baseline scenario, the market is forecast to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 2.8%, with apparent consumption projected to exceed 6.38 million metric tons by 2031.
- Green Transition: Under an aggressive green transition scenario, surging carbon prices would fundamentally disrupt existing cost structures. The share of green electricity-powered production capacity in Southwest China could surge to 58%. Enterprises must accelerate decarbonization initiatives and develop low-carbon, specialty-grade products to overcome export barriers.

III. Risks and Opportunities
- Risks: Disruptive innovations—such as enzymatic alternatives—pose potential competitive threats to traditional sodium sulfide applications; concurrently, supply-chain disruptions affecting critical equipment remain a material risk.
- Opportunities: Digital transformation presents a pivotal strategic lever: smart manufacturing, digital supply chain platforms, and data-driven demand forecasting and inventory management can significantly enhance competitiveness. Companies should deepen full-value-chain cost control, deploy waste-heat recovery and solid-waste recycling systems to fortify cost advantages, and strategically target high-value niche markets—including electronic-grade and battery-grade sodium sulfide—while building a verifiable 'carbon-neutral' brand to capture green premiums.

About Sodium sulfide




This chemical is included in Basic Chemicals. See more about what is Sodium sulfide and Sodium sulfide SDS information.

Find Sodium sulfide supply and Sodium sulfide suppliers on Guidechem to meet your sourcing needs from 182 trusted and certifedsuppliers.

More Related Products Prices

N,N-Dimethylformamide Potassium hydroxide powdered activated carbon Formic acid Propylene glycol Xylene ethyl acetate Sodium carbonate diethylene glycol Phenol Dichloromethane Glycerol tert-Butyl methyl ether Ethylene glycol Acetic acid cylindrical activated carbon styrene Isopropyl alcohol Epichlorohydrin Benzene

Guidechem assumes no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this site. The information contained in this site is provided on an “as is” basis with no guarantees of completeness, accuracy, usefulness, fitness for purpose or timeliness.

 
 
My Follow
Comparison
No Selected:0 indicators Follow Clear
Tip: Curve comparison supports up to 10 indicators, and the display order of indicators can be adjusted by dragging them,View Comparison
睢宁县| 平舆县| 噶尔县| 南部县| 莱西市| 多伦县| 深水埗区| 莎车县| 新丰县| 辉南县| 灵武市| 普宁市| 宝山区| 克拉玛依市| 高青县| 石柱| 偃师市| 南开区| 荆州市| 塔城市| 吉水县| 同德县| 安庆市| 都匀市| 昌图县| 阳江市| 渭源县| 辽阳市| 桑植县| 措勤县| 永清县| 铅山县| 永川市| 海兴县| 涡阳县| 邵阳县| 马尔康县| 英吉沙县| 都昌县| 夏邑县| 巫山县|